Gender-Neutral and Inclusive Language
For more information on this topic, see page 30 of the CAR.
For the purposes of these questions, we intend to focus on gender-neutral language in NA literature as described in the CAR essay—changes in the language that describes people (members and potential members), not language that describes a Higher Power. These changes in wording—from “men and women” to “people,” for instance—don’t change the meaning of the message in our literature; they allow more people to identify with it. Issues of the wording of our Steps and Traditions are for a future discussion.
Given that we all want to provide a safe, welcoming inclusive Fellowship where everyone can recover (regardless of . . . ), are we willing to explore these types of changes in our literature in order to carry the message more effectively? If not, why not?